Australian judge declares rape of 10yo girl ‘not violent’

Judge Michael Rackemann sentenced the man to seven years and three months behind bars and said it would have been much higher had there been any violence towards the girl.

Complete with the unduly lenient sentence, no charge apparent for the making of child pornography either. Queensland feminists, a call to action to appeal the lenient sentencing, and the judge’s hideous remarks in a CSA case.

Here is the full story, from the Queensland Times:

AN IPSWICH man who video recorded himself raping his biological daughter has been jailed.

The man, who cannot be identified in order to protect his daughter’s identity, pleaded guilty yesterday in the Brisbane District Court to rape, indecent assault and producing child exploitation material.

The court was told the offences occurred between 2010 and 2011 when the girl was aged between 9 and 10 years.

Crown prosecutor Deborah Holliday said the man had filmed himself committing various sex acts, including penile rape, against his daughter while she lay on a bed.

The Queensland Times has chosen not to reveal the graphic details contained in the video recording.

Ms Holliday said the man had been on the police radar for a while before he was eventually arrested over the crimes.

“His former partner (not the girl’s mother) was doing something on his computer one day in October, 2012 and came across the video,” she said.

“She reported it to police.

“Early the following year he showed his current partner the video and she told him to destroy it.

“The next day she reported it to police and he was subsequently arrested.”

Judge Michael Rackemann sentenced the man to seven years and three months behind bars and said it would have been much higher had there been any violence towards the girl.

The man will be eligible to apply for parole on August 12, 2017.

That eligibility for parole, a mere two years and five months away. This is an appalling miscarriage of justice.

 

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Australian judge declares rape of 10yo girl ‘not violent’

  1. As always men are the ones (so they claim because males are the generic default humans whereas we females are non-human) who can only define what does and does not constitute ‘real male sexual violence perpetrated against women and girls.’ This is why men have always narrowly defined ‘real rape and real male sexual violence’ because said narrow definitions ensure men’s pseudo sex right to females of all ages is perceived not as ‘male sexual predation but male sex right!’

    Would same judge utter the same lies/excuses/denials if the victim had been a 9 year old boy? I do not think so because males have always claimed males sexually preying on male children is a crime but males sexually preying on female children is not a crime – merely enactment of sacrosanct male sex right!

    According to this judge then if a male murders another male by hitting the male victim on the head and he dies instantly – then said male murderer did not commit murder because the male victim didn’t resist/fight back!!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s